A comparison of the views of marx and kierkegaard

The first is egoistic suicide, in which an individual no longer see a purpose to life and sees life as meaningless. Durkheim remarks that if the societal forces central to the religious life of a society are not re-animated, they will be forgotten, leaving individuals with no knowledge of the ties that exist between them and no concept of the society to which they belong.

Voluntary acts are links in a chain of events beginning with objective circumstances and ending with objective consequences.

Søren Kierkegaard

As soon as a person thinks that one of these stages is adequate and that he dares to concentrate on it one-sidedly, he has not chosen himself ethically but has failed to see the significance of either isolation or continuity and above all has not grasped that the truth lies in the identity of the two.

Halls, Steven Lukes, ed. The desire to live, and to live in the right way, for the right reasons, and with the right desires, is a holy and sacred force. From this Durkheim would never recover and in November he died of a stroke, leaving his last great work, La Morale Moralitywith only a preliminary introduction.

The power of religion must therefore be objectified, or somehow made visible, and the object onto which this force is projected becomes sacred. The pagan likewise struggles with uncertainty and takes hold of faith, while the Christian settles for a mere approximation of God.

We are swindled by the limitations of time, history, and death, which nullify our fondest hopes. The absence of cause-and-effect relations endows reality with a duplicity and disorder which renders it hopelessly obscure.

With the neighbor you have the equality of a human being before God. The absurdity of existence must be lived through, suffered, defied; it cannot be satisfactorily explained.

Finally, individuals are ill at ease with themselves. If man has free will, he cannot be at the mercy of his environment. To exist is an art. Rather, they have a definite form and specific qualities such as minutes, weeks, months for time, or north, south, inches, kilometers for space.

Existentialism remains fundamentally a creed of frustration in the midst of fulfilment. Yet, what exactly does Durkheim understand morality to be? He notes that this is the most common in the world. The question remains, however, why is it that human pathos or passion is the most precious thing?

He says, be whatever you want, but remember that your soul belongs to God, not to the world. This is direct communication and Kierkegaard thinks this might be useful for theologians, philosophers, and historians associations but not at all useful for the "single individual" who is interested in becoming a Christian.

But Climacus's special interest was in history. This is obvious under slavery, which was the first organised system of alienated labour.Georg Lukács wrote The Theory of the Novel ina period that also saw the conception of Rosa Luxemburg's Spartacus Letters, Lenin's Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, Spengler's Decline of the West, and Ernst Bloch's Spirit of calgaryrefugeehealth.com many of Lukács's early essays, it is a radical critique of bourgeois culture and stems from a specific Central European philosophy of.

Marx's Criticism of Feuerbach and Its Application to Kierkegaard Karl Marx has a clearly expressed critique of Ludwig Feuerbach; this critique is contained in Marx's "Theses on Feuerbach." Of course there is no expressed criticism by Marx of Søren Kierkegaard since Marx was not familiar with Kierkegaard's works.

To a large extent, these views had even infiltrated the church in Kierkegaard’s day.

Émile Durkheim (1858—1917)

Because of the cold, somber view that reason could bring a person to God, the church in Kierkegaard’s day had many empty seats. Founded inPrinceton University Press is an independent publisher with close connections, both formal and informal, to Princeton University.

Jul 31,  · Kierkegaard vs Hegel - Objectivity, Subjectivity, and Faith The following is a paper I submitted during my undergrad studies at Calvin College. I hope you find it beneficial and that it clarifies some of the nuances existing between thinkers like Kierkegaard and Hegel.

Émile Durkheim (—) Émile Durkheim was a French sociologist who rose to prominence in the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries. Along with Karl Marx and Max Weber, he is credited as being one of the principal founders of modern sociology.

A comparison of the views of marx and kierkegaard
Rated 3/5 based on 89 review